| The
Problem:
Besides interpolation methods,
the Triangular Irregular Network (TIN) is the most widely used method
for creating DEM's from contour lines and spot heights. Unfortunately,
if we use the TIN method in it's simplest form, the resulting DEM
is often completely distorted (see Figures 1, 2 and 3):
Click on the images to get the bigger picture...
Fig. 1
|
Original
data from Digitized contour lines and spot heights |

Fig. 2
|
TIN
generated directly from contours. A number of "flat triangles" result. These are displayed here in yellow. |

Fig. 3
|
Critical
deformation of the DEM results. A comparison of the original
contours and those generated from the deformed DEM bear little
resemblance. |
The DEMix Solution:
The main mathematical algorithms
in DEMix allow that:
- "Workflow line points" describing the terrain are generated from the input contour lines
- Heights are assigned to the "structure line points" by means of the input contour lines and spot heights (fig. 4)
- A TIN is generated from the input contour lines and spot heights, with due regard being given to the newly acquired "structure line points" (fig. 5)
- A DEM is interpolated from the TIN and "new" contour lines are generated from the DEM (fig. 6). Fig. 7 shows the superimposition of the input contour lines (black) and the new DEMix derived contour lines (red). At this point it is possible to uncover errors in the original data.
- All of these steps are iterative and can produce converging results
Click on the images to get the bigger picture...
Fig. 4
|
"Workflow
Line Points" are automatically generated from the input contours
and spot heights. |
Fig. 5
|
A
TIN is generated from the input contours and spot heights with
due reference being given to the newly derived "Workflow Line
Points". No flat triangles are created. |
Fig. 6
|
The
DEM generated from DEMix with the new contours generated
from that DEM. |
Fig. 7
|
On-screen
comparison of the original contours and those generated from
the DEMix derived DEM. |
DEMix also produces excellent
results in mountainous areas (fig. 8 to fig. 10).
Click
on the images to get the bigger picture...

Fig. 8
|
Contours
derived solely from TIN with no "Workflow Line Points". |

Fig. 9
|
"Workflow
Line Points" derived from DEMix. |

Fig. 10
|
Superimposition
of contours derived from DEMix (using "Workflow Line
Points") and original contours. |
|